“They are mystical stones, and of medicinal virtue. The giants of old brought them from the farthest coasts of Africa, and placed them in Ireland, while they inhabited that country.”
Geoffrey of Monmouth, The British History of, translated from the Latin by A. Thompson and J. A. Giles, James Bohn, London, 1842, p.158 (Bk 8, Ch. 11).

Image from http://www.egyptiandawn.info/chapter8.html
Following on from my previous post regarding the actual location of the Stone Circle of Mzora (also Msoura/Mezorah) I thought I’d write a brief entry about the monument itself and why it is so interesting.

I am indebted to Robert Temple for the bulk of the information contained in this post and the majority of the illustrations used appear on his website at http://www.egyptiandawn.info.

Mzora lies roughly 11km from Asilah and about 27km from another interesting site at Lixus on the coast (a future post will concern the megalithic stone wall there). 
The Mzora stone ring is a Neolithic ellipse of 168 surviving stones of the 175 originally believed to have existed. The tallest of these stones is over 5m in height. The ellipse has a major axis of 59.29 metres and a minor axis of 56.18 metres. At the centre of the ring, and quite probably a much later addition, is a large tumulus. Not much remains of this tumulus today, the bulk of the damage to it seems to have been done by excavations undertaken in 1935-6 by César Luis de Montalban. It was he who cut across the mound in two intersecting trenches leaving the distinctive ‘X’ shaped scar visible today (Temple, Robert (2010). Egyptian Dawn. London: Century. p378).

The only survey of the site was conducted in the 1970s by James Watt Mavor, Junior of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute in Massachusetts, USA. It is this survey that revealed Mzora to be not only remarkable in its own right but to have implications for the history of megalithic sites in Britain.

Incredibly Mzora appears to have been constructed either by the same culture that erected the megalithic sites in France, Britain and Ireland or by one that was intimately connected with them. The ellipse is constructed using a Pythagorean right angled triangle of the ratio 12, 35, 37. This same technique was used in the construction of British stone ellipses. Of the use of Pythagorean triangles in British sites Professor Alexander Thom remarked:
“The remarkable thing is that the largest, the 12, 35, 37, was known and exploited more than any other with the exception of the 3, 4, 5.”
Thom, Alexander (1967). Megalithic Sites in Britain. Oxford: OUP. p.27.
Image from http://www.egyptiandawn.info/chapter8.html
Furthermore it appears that the same unit of measure, the megalithic yard (or something remarkably close) used in the construction of the British sites surveyed by Thom, was also used in the construction of Mzora:

“If a ‘megalithic yard’ of 0.836 metres … [is used] … then the major axis and the perimeter of the ring take on values nearly integral.”
Temple, Robert (2010). Egyptian Dawn. London: Century. p379.

Thom proposed that achieving a circumference measured in whole numbers was of paramount importance to the builders of megalithic rings:

“When Megalithic man set out a circle with a diameter of 8 units he found the circumference very nearly 25 units but in general he could not get nice whole numbers like these for both the diameter and the circumference simultaneously. Probably the attraction of the ellipse, and we know of over 30 set out by these people, was that it […] was easier to get the circumference near to some desired value.”
Thom, Alexander (1967). Megalithic Sites in Britain. Oxford: OUP. p.31.

But there are further wonders.

According to the diagram below by James Watt Mavor the following astronomical phenomena are marked by the circle:

Stone 30 marks the summer solstice sunrise.
Stone 146 marks the summer solstice sunset.
Stones 61 and 62 mark the winter solstice sunrise.
Stone 118 marks the winter solstice sunset.
Stone 47 marks the equinoctial sunrise
Stone 132 marks the equinoctial sunset
Temple, Robert (2010). Egyptian Dawn. London: Century. p391.
Image from http://www.egyptiandawn.info/chapter8.html
It is nothing short of scandalous that this monument isn’t given world heritage status and appropriate protection.

For further discussion of the importance of this site see Chapter 8 of Robert Temple's book, Egyptian Dawn (2010).

NOTE: This isn't the only stone circle in Africa to share its construction methodology with British sites. The Nabta Playa stone ring in Southern Egypt conforms to Alexander Thom's "Type I egg" geometry. The mystery deepens ....

EDIT: I've created some rough illustrations below in Photoshop to compare the James Watt Mavor survey with the Google Earth images from my previous post.

Caveat: unless the camera taking the photograph for Google Earth is directly overhead the object of interest, the image will be slightly distorted and therefore an exact match with the survey is not possible. Nevertheless as a rough guide to the features and orientation of the site the images match up surprisingly closely.
©Graham Salisbury 2011
wilf cromie
28/01/2011 12:49

when did these stone circles first appear and about what year?

are they older than the pyramids of egypt?


Chris H
29/01/2011 03:00

Readers not familiar with "America's Stonehenge" in Salem, NH should google it. None of the uprights are as large as 2 meters, most smaller, but the layout is impressive. Some claim it's 4000 years old, others say the central slabs, weighing tons, are part of an animal shelter set up by colonial farmers (seems unlikely) Barry Fell ("America BC" and "Saga America" wrote about it. Many of us camped out there on the date of the 'harmonic convergence', Aug 16-17 of 1987! A must if you're near Boston-- about one hour north on I-93.

14/05/2012 12:31

I've visited a couple of times. Some fallen or disturbed stones lie 100m outside the circle. 10km to the north is the Roman site of Ad Mercuri (stick N35 31.326 W5 54.911 into Google Earth)


Your comment will be posted after it is approved.

Leave a Reply.

Graham Salisbury